December 31 Update: Donald Trump has yet to concede to Joe Biden in the 2020 Presidential election amid claims of widespread fraud (though most Vegas political sportsbooks have paid out Biden bettors already). However, the biggest event right now is the Georgia Senate runoff on January 5, and all the top online election betting sites are offering odds on the races between Kelly Loeffler (R) and Raphael Warnock (D), and David Perdue (R) and Jon Ossoff (D).
- Democratic Polls Odds Against
- Democratic Polls Us
- Democratic Polls Betting Odds
- Democratic Polls Usa
- Democratic Polls Odds Today
- Democratic Polls Odds 2019
US politics betting for all American markets. Get 2020 Election odds, including Democrat and Republican candidates, plus midterm specials and much more. Democrat Raphael Warnock is now favored to defeat Republican incumbent Kelly Loeffler, according to PredictIt odds, after overtaking Loeffler on Wednesday for the first time during the runoff.
After a previous unprecedented election cycle that included one of the most jaw-dropping Presidential campaign seasons in history and that has unilaterally redefined politics in America, it would take a lot to shock us at this point. When we recognized the surge in popularity for bettors seeking Vegas election odds and betting lines, we weren't surprised in the least.
In fact, this is one of the more sensible trends of the 2020 Presidential race that we've seen emerge. The American public and the International audiences have all been much more involved with this election than any other in US history. With endless coverage of every minuscule detail of the race, people are feeling more inclined to add some betting action to their politics this year.
Democratic voters list Sens. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) as their top picks for vice president, a new Hill-HarrisX poll finds. (Worth noting: Biden is ahead of Trump by 9 points in CNN's poll of polls.) If Biden loses (and Jones loses), then Democrats need to net five Republican seats. Luckily for them, they've got a.
Average: 51.9 52 R 56 D 80% of outcomes fall in this range 80% of outcomes fall in this range More likely 60 60 58 58 56 56 54 54 52 52 50 50 52 52 54 54 56 56 58 58 60 60 62 62 64 64 66 66.
This guide is designed to provide additional insight for those interested in accessing current Vegas election odds for the 2020 Presidential election, as well as information on legally licensed and regulated offshore sportsbooks that accept political bets placed by US residents. We will provide brief biographies on each relevant candidates running for President, potential VP candidates and their odds, and valuable information about political betting options for the 2020 election cycle and all future upcoming US elections.
Coronavirus Update: The Coronavirus has affected everything in the USA from sports to politics. Our guide to how the Coronavirus has affected Vegas election odds goes into further detail about primary postponements, President Trump's odds, candidate odds, and more.
Top Sportsbooks Offering Betting Odds
For The Presidential Election
Site | Bonus | Rating/5 | USA | Visit |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 50% Max $250 | 4.5 | ||
2 | 50% Max $1,000 | 4.4 | ||
3 | 100% Max $1,000 | 4.4 | ||
3 | 75% Max $1,000 | 4.1 |
Vegas Election Odds - President
- Kamala Harris +450
- Joe Biden +600
- Donald Trump Sr. +800
- Nikki Haley +1200
- Andrew Yang +1600
- Mike Pence +1600
- Michelle Obama +2000
- Pete Buttigieg +2000
- Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez +2500
- Bernie Sanders +2500
- Beto O'Rourke +2500
- Elizabeth Warren +2500
- John Kasich +2500
- Mark Cuban +2500
- Stacey Abrams +2500
- Andrew Cuomo +3000
- Tim Scott +3000
- Ted Cruz +3300
- Kamala Harris +400
- Joe Biden +500
- Mike Pence +600
- Nikki Haley +1400
- Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez +1600
- Ron DeSantis +1800
- Michelle Obama +2500
- Donald Trump Sr. +3300
- Andrew Yang +4000
- Josh Hawley +4000
- Pete Buttigieg +4000
- Tom Cotton +4000
- Bernie Sanders +5000
- Candace Owens +5000
- Charlie Baker +5000
- Chris Christie +5000
- Dan Crenshaw +5000
- Deval Patrick +5000
- Donald Trump Jr. +5000
- Mike Pompeo +5000
- Tulsi Gabbard +5000
- Amy Klobuchar +6600
- Beto O'Rourke +6600
- Condoleezza Rice +6600
- Cory Booker +6600
- Elizabeth Warren +6600
- Gavin Newsom +6600
- Kamala Harris +400
- Joe Biden +500
- Mike Pence +600
- Nikki Haley +1400
- Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez +1600
- Ron DeSantis +1800
- Michelle Obama +2500
- Donald Trump Sr. +3300
- Andrew Yang +4000
- Josh Hawley +4000
- Pete Buttigieg +4000
- Tom Cotton +4000
- Bernie Sanders +5000
- Candace Owens +5000
- Charlie Baker +5000
- Chris Christie +5000
- Dan Crenshaw +5000
- Deval Patrick +5000
- Donald Trump Jr. +5000
- Mike Pompeo +5000
- Tulsi Gabbard +5000
- Amy Klobuchar +6600
- Beto O'Rourke +6600
- Condoleezza Rice +6600
- Cory Booker +6600
- Elizabeth Warren +6600
- Gavin Newsom +6600
Remaining Candidates Still Alive In The 2020 Presidential Race
Relatively early on, the Presidential candidates were finally narrowed down to just two, Joe Biden and Donald Trump. The Democratic field started with 27 candidates, but the field has slowly eroded away to the remaining candidate. Other Third-Party candidates and Independents were expected to run (and did so), but there were only two real candidates for the 2020 Presidential election. You can find valuable information on those two nominees and other potential candidates in our political news section.
With the 2020 general election all but over, it appears that Biden has the edge on Trump to win the White House. The results are sure to be contested, and you can bet that there will be plenty of betting lines and props on all the intrigue that's headed our way in the aftermath of November 3.
- Eric Swalwell
- Jay Inslee
- John Hickenlooper
- Kirsten Gillibrand
- Richard Ojeda
- Seth Moulton
- Bill de Blasio
- Tim Ryan
- Beto O'Rourke
- Mark Sanford
- Wayne Messam
- Joe Sestak
- Steve Bullock
- Kamala Harris
- Julian Castro
- Marianne Williamson
- Cory Booker
- John Delaney
- Joe Walsh
- Andrew Yang
- Michael Bennet
- Deval Patrick
- Tom Steyer
- Pete Buttigieg
- Amy Klobuchar
- Michael Bloomberg
- Elizabeth Warren
- Tulsi Gabbard
- Bill Weld
- Bernie Sanders
Other Political Betting Options
In addition to betting on the 2020 Presidential election, there were other political betting options available to US bettors during the latest cycle. The following types of election betting lines can't be found in Vegas, but online, the political betting options are endless.
FAQ's Related To The Presidential Race
Vegas odds on the Presidential election have been a highly sought after commodity this year, and as the November 3rd Election Day neared, gamblers were becoming even more active on political betting lines.
Political wagering involves unique nuances and distinctions that other betting markets do not touch on and taps into a very personal and emotional segment of the wagering experience for American gamblers. Never before has a United States Presidential election been so volatile or included such controversy, and this could be the new norm.
Record-breaking early voting statistics are both a result of the most dramatic Presidential election in American history and a big influencer on the odds boards. The following are some of the most frequently asked questions concerning Vegas odds on the 2020 Presidential election and how bettors can participate in this popular trend that is taking the gambling entertainment industry by storm.
As long as your are placing your bets at a legally licensed and regulated online sportsbooks located outside of the United States, then yes, it is perfectly legal for US gamblers to bet on the 2020 Vegas election odds and all other election lines. The sportsbooks featured in this guide are all operating legally within the industry and offer legitimate wagering opportunities to American bettors. There are no US federal laws that prohibit Americans from enjoying online political betting at a legal online sports betting site that holds the proper credentials and operates overseas.
Unless you live in the state of Washington or Connecticut, state gambling laws do not make it illegal to participate in licensed online political betting from offshore destinations. However, the anti-online-betting laws in WA and CT are historically unenforced, though you proceed at your own risk.
Note: You will currently not find election odds at domestic Vegas sportsbooks or other physical or online venues based in the US. However, it usually isn't technically illegal for these books to offer political lines. Instead, state gaming regulators are simply reticent to offer such lines to the public. That's why offshore betting remains your best bet for political wagering.
You will find that the Vegas odds on the Presidential election do not always line up with the latest polls released by various media outlets. This is due to several reasons. First, the polls are often manipulated and manufactured in order to influence public perception and sway the masses. Secondly, political polls simply are not reliable due to the many variables involved in authentic polling and tracking.
When the oddsmakers are determining the relevant and current odds, they use a more effective and well-rounded series of data and research to reflect the actual pulse of the American voting public. It is in their best interest to achieve a clear and concise understanding of how the voters are leaning in order to ensure the integrity of the betting action and to minimize their risks. In many ways, the Vegas betting odds for who will win the Presidency are more reliable than any political poll.
While you will certainly find Vegas odds on who will become the next President of the United States, you will also find betting odds and lines that cover a host of other categories, including the following:
- Which party will win the election
- Which candidate and which party will win the popular vote
- What percentage of the vote each candidate will receive
- How many states each candidate will win
- Which side individual states will fall on
- Presidential impeachment and removal
These are just a few of the samples that you'll find. Various political props bets have also emerged as the Presidential debates took place.
While a simple Google search will yield various odds results, we recommend that you only consider the input of industry professionals. We strongly urge you to limit your betting action to only those online sportsbook destinations that have been vetted and approved by experienced analysts, such as the team that created this guide. In addition to verifying the legitimacy and quality of each sportsbook brand, we also analyze the betting odds, lines and paylines to ensure they are comparable with the Vegas bookmakers' consensus.
You will notice that if you compare the lines at the sportsbooks we recommend, you'll see different odds for the same categories and races. Most legitimate participants in the industry will usually all be pretty close to each other in terms of the odds, though you can sometimes find major outliers that can carry a nice 'presidential' profit. That's why we always recommend signing up at multiple books and shopping lines to find the best prices on every wager.
Just be careful of odds that look too good to be true, like a yuge payout on Donald Trump to win in 2020. Any book offering large positive moneylines on a Trump win are to be avoided. Remember: Questionable sportsbooks will offer unrealistic odds and betting lines to attract players in an effort to defraud or steal from them. Betting on politics online is very safe, as long as you are diligent and selective in where you place your bets.
Yes, you can vote for any candidate, regardless of your political affiliation or leanings. In fact, we encourage you not to limit your betting action to only those candidates that you would vote for. You may hate the front runner or love the underdog, and in both cases you would ‘feel' in opposition to the odds. The odds are mathematically calculated predictions that may very well not line up with your personal preferences, but they show where the public is betting, and elections are public events.
The point of gambling is to win money, not to take a political stance. Using your voice to make a difference is what the voting booth is for, not the betting lines. Apply the odds logically to your specific strategy, whether you love going with long shots or playing it safe.
So, which Democratic presidential hopeful won the latest showdown?
It's not always easy to tell what's going to move the needle in a given candidate's direction, but debates are considered a decent indicator of how the country will respond in the next batch of national polls.
Of course, major news sites often get a jump on those polls by running their own informal reader polls in the wake of major televised political events. Several outlets have done just that for the third Democratic debate that aired last night on ABC.
Bookmakers pay attention to these polls, as do bettors who pour their money into whichever candidate they think performed best on stage. As such, the DNC election odds have shifted at several betting sites thanks to last night's three-hour marathon of policy and pandering.
Online betting site Bovada was among the first books to change its odds after the conclusion of the third DNC event. Debate participants are listed below in bold, with each candidate's pre-debate odds included in parentheses.
2020 Democratic Nomination Odds
Per Bovada's Democratic Odds
- Elizabeth Warren +175 (+200)
- Joe Biden +275 (+250)
- Bernie Sanders +575 (+550)
- Kamala Harris +700 (+600)
- Andrew Yang +1000 (-)
- Pete Buttigieg +1000 (-)
- Cory Booker +4000 (-)
- Tulsi Gabbard +4000 (-)
- Beto O'Rourke +6600 (+5000)
- Amy Klobuchar +7500 (-)
- Julián Castro +7500 (-)
- Tom Steyer +10000 (-)
- Marianne Williamson +10000 (-)
- Michael Bennet +12500 (-)
- Bill de Blasio +15000 (-)
- John Delaney +15000 (-)
- Robby Wells +20000 (-)
As you can see, per US sportsbooks and bettors, Elizabeth Warren was the overall winner of the latest debate, with her odds shrinking from +200 to +175 to win the DNC nomination. Ncaa tournament spread picks.
Joe Biden and Bernie Sanders slipped a bit, Kamala Harris slipped even more, and Beto O'Rourke was the biggest loser of the night. The rest of the field – including Andrew Yang, Pete Buttigieg, Cory Booker, Amy Klobuchar, and Julian Castro – held steady.
That said, online polling in the immediate aftermath of the debate tells a dramatically different story, with Andrew Yang being the overwhelming winner at many outlets.
Oddly, Yang had his highest approval ratings at decidedly conservative news websites, while establishment candidates were upheld at traditional left and center-left networks.
Gin rummy point rules. Yang's popularity among Republican readers can likely be explained in two main ways. First, the guy might be so radical in many of his platforms that the political Right views him as the smallest threat to dethrone President Donald Trump in the 2020 general election. Alternatively, he might be the calmest, most reasonable voice in a rabid crowd of crazy.
In many ways, the #YangGang might be this cycle's #FeelTheBern.
Here is a brief rundown of the mainstream media's polls and analyses of the event. Note that the major left-leaning networks have not published reader polls, deferring to in-house analysts to format and guide the DNC narrative.
ABC News
ABC didn't run a reader poll, but it does offer several 'key takeaways' (including your scary black AR-15).
Breitbart
The biggest right-wing site on the Internet, Breitbart runs polls for just about everything. Per the aforementioned trend, Yang is the top choice by far, with Biden, Klobuchar, Sanders, and Warren each well behind him.
- Yang: 30.77%
- Biden: 17.7%
- Klobuchar 15.5%
- Sanders 10.93%
- Warren 6.13%
- O'Rourke 5.5%
- Castro 5.02%
- Buttigieg 3.45%
- Booker 3.29%
- Harris 1.7%
CBS News
CBS News didn't publish a reader poll, but they've got some video analysis. By all means, watch it if you've got nothing better to do.
CNN
With nary a poll to be found, CNN helpfully put together a list of debate winners and losers. Nearly half of the candidates on stage – including Booker, Buttigieg, Klobuchar, and Sanders – apparently weren't worth mentioning.
Winners
- Biden
- O'Rourke
- Obama (not actually a candidate)
- Harris
Losers
- Castro
- Yang
- Warren
- The Economy (not even a person)
Drudge Report
While the Drudge Report is a link aggregator and not a proper news outlet, the right-wing site ran a reader poll right after the debate. The results overwhelmingly favored Yang, with Biden and Klobuchar taking second and third, respectively.
- Yang – 35%
- Biden – 22%
- Klobuchar – 14%
- Warren – 7%
- Buttigieg – 5%
- Sanders – 5%
- O'Rourke – 4%
- Booker – 3%
- Castro – 3%
- Harris – 2%
Fox News
The mainstream frontrunners – Biden, Warren, and Sanders – were each simultaneous winners and losers per Fox News' Fair and Balanced™ reporting. Center-right Fox seems convinced that one of these three candidates will take the DNC nomination and has deemed the remaining field irrelevant.
MSNBC/NBC
Another mainstream left-wing site (or two), another deferral to 'analysts' instead of readers. Of course, who needs a poll with such a fine group of upstanding individuals?
Jon Jones vs Lyoto Machida FULL FIGHT. Jon jones instagram.
Winners
- Biden
- Booker
- Buttigieg
- Castro
- Harris
- Klobuchar
- O'Rourke
- Sanders
- Warren
- Yang
Losers
Democratic Polls Odds Against
- At MSNBC/NBC, there's no such thing as a Democrat loser because all Democrats are winners!
These are just a few of the samples that you'll find. Various political props bets have also emerged as the Presidential debates took place.
While a simple Google search will yield various odds results, we recommend that you only consider the input of industry professionals. We strongly urge you to limit your betting action to only those online sportsbook destinations that have been vetted and approved by experienced analysts, such as the team that created this guide. In addition to verifying the legitimacy and quality of each sportsbook brand, we also analyze the betting odds, lines and paylines to ensure they are comparable with the Vegas bookmakers' consensus.
You will notice that if you compare the lines at the sportsbooks we recommend, you'll see different odds for the same categories and races. Most legitimate participants in the industry will usually all be pretty close to each other in terms of the odds, though you can sometimes find major outliers that can carry a nice 'presidential' profit. That's why we always recommend signing up at multiple books and shopping lines to find the best prices on every wager.
Just be careful of odds that look too good to be true, like a yuge payout on Donald Trump to win in 2020. Any book offering large positive moneylines on a Trump win are to be avoided. Remember: Questionable sportsbooks will offer unrealistic odds and betting lines to attract players in an effort to defraud or steal from them. Betting on politics online is very safe, as long as you are diligent and selective in where you place your bets.
Yes, you can vote for any candidate, regardless of your political affiliation or leanings. In fact, we encourage you not to limit your betting action to only those candidates that you would vote for. You may hate the front runner or love the underdog, and in both cases you would ‘feel' in opposition to the odds. The odds are mathematically calculated predictions that may very well not line up with your personal preferences, but they show where the public is betting, and elections are public events.
The point of gambling is to win money, not to take a political stance. Using your voice to make a difference is what the voting booth is for, not the betting lines. Apply the odds logically to your specific strategy, whether you love going with long shots or playing it safe.
So, which Democratic presidential hopeful won the latest showdown?
It's not always easy to tell what's going to move the needle in a given candidate's direction, but debates are considered a decent indicator of how the country will respond in the next batch of national polls.
Of course, major news sites often get a jump on those polls by running their own informal reader polls in the wake of major televised political events. Several outlets have done just that for the third Democratic debate that aired last night on ABC.
Bookmakers pay attention to these polls, as do bettors who pour their money into whichever candidate they think performed best on stage. As such, the DNC election odds have shifted at several betting sites thanks to last night's three-hour marathon of policy and pandering.
Online betting site Bovada was among the first books to change its odds after the conclusion of the third DNC event. Debate participants are listed below in bold, with each candidate's pre-debate odds included in parentheses.
2020 Democratic Nomination Odds
Per Bovada's Democratic Odds
- Elizabeth Warren +175 (+200)
- Joe Biden +275 (+250)
- Bernie Sanders +575 (+550)
- Kamala Harris +700 (+600)
- Andrew Yang +1000 (-)
- Pete Buttigieg +1000 (-)
- Cory Booker +4000 (-)
- Tulsi Gabbard +4000 (-)
- Beto O'Rourke +6600 (+5000)
- Amy Klobuchar +7500 (-)
- Julián Castro +7500 (-)
- Tom Steyer +10000 (-)
- Marianne Williamson +10000 (-)
- Michael Bennet +12500 (-)
- Bill de Blasio +15000 (-)
- John Delaney +15000 (-)
- Robby Wells +20000 (-)
As you can see, per US sportsbooks and bettors, Elizabeth Warren was the overall winner of the latest debate, with her odds shrinking from +200 to +175 to win the DNC nomination. Ncaa tournament spread picks.
Joe Biden and Bernie Sanders slipped a bit, Kamala Harris slipped even more, and Beto O'Rourke was the biggest loser of the night. The rest of the field – including Andrew Yang, Pete Buttigieg, Cory Booker, Amy Klobuchar, and Julian Castro – held steady.
That said, online polling in the immediate aftermath of the debate tells a dramatically different story, with Andrew Yang being the overwhelming winner at many outlets.
Oddly, Yang had his highest approval ratings at decidedly conservative news websites, while establishment candidates were upheld at traditional left and center-left networks.
Gin rummy point rules. Yang's popularity among Republican readers can likely be explained in two main ways. First, the guy might be so radical in many of his platforms that the political Right views him as the smallest threat to dethrone President Donald Trump in the 2020 general election. Alternatively, he might be the calmest, most reasonable voice in a rabid crowd of crazy.
In many ways, the #YangGang might be this cycle's #FeelTheBern.
Here is a brief rundown of the mainstream media's polls and analyses of the event. Note that the major left-leaning networks have not published reader polls, deferring to in-house analysts to format and guide the DNC narrative.
ABC News
ABC didn't run a reader poll, but it does offer several 'key takeaways' (including your scary black AR-15).
Breitbart
The biggest right-wing site on the Internet, Breitbart runs polls for just about everything. Per the aforementioned trend, Yang is the top choice by far, with Biden, Klobuchar, Sanders, and Warren each well behind him.
- Yang: 30.77%
- Biden: 17.7%
- Klobuchar 15.5%
- Sanders 10.93%
- Warren 6.13%
- O'Rourke 5.5%
- Castro 5.02%
- Buttigieg 3.45%
- Booker 3.29%
- Harris 1.7%
CBS News
CBS News didn't publish a reader poll, but they've got some video analysis. By all means, watch it if you've got nothing better to do.
CNN
With nary a poll to be found, CNN helpfully put together a list of debate winners and losers. Nearly half of the candidates on stage – including Booker, Buttigieg, Klobuchar, and Sanders – apparently weren't worth mentioning.
Winners
- Biden
- O'Rourke
- Obama (not actually a candidate)
- Harris
Losers
- Castro
- Yang
- Warren
- The Economy (not even a person)
Drudge Report
While the Drudge Report is a link aggregator and not a proper news outlet, the right-wing site ran a reader poll right after the debate. The results overwhelmingly favored Yang, with Biden and Klobuchar taking second and third, respectively.
- Yang – 35%
- Biden – 22%
- Klobuchar – 14%
- Warren – 7%
- Buttigieg – 5%
- Sanders – 5%
- O'Rourke – 4%
- Booker – 3%
- Castro – 3%
- Harris – 2%
Fox News
The mainstream frontrunners – Biden, Warren, and Sanders – were each simultaneous winners and losers per Fox News' Fair and Balanced™ reporting. Center-right Fox seems convinced that one of these three candidates will take the DNC nomination and has deemed the remaining field irrelevant.
MSNBC/NBC
Another mainstream left-wing site (or two), another deferral to 'analysts' instead of readers. Of course, who needs a poll with such a fine group of upstanding individuals?
Jon Jones vs Lyoto Machida FULL FIGHT. Jon jones instagram.
Winners
- Biden
- Booker
- Buttigieg
- Castro
- Harris
- Klobuchar
- O'Rourke
- Sanders
- Warren
- Yang
Losers
Democratic Polls Odds Against
- At MSNBC/NBC, there's no such thing as a Democrat loser because all Democrats are winners!
New York Times
The NYT's debate coverage is hiding behind a pay/subscriber wall, but if you're willing to sign up for emails and/or give them some money, you can read about how the mainstream Democrat frontrunners blew their competition away.
Winners
- Warren
- Sanders
- Biden
- Harris
Losers
- Castro
- O'Rourke
- Booker
- Klobuchar
- Buttigieg
- Yang
Politico
Democratic Polls Us
At left-leaning Politico, Booker, Buttigieg, and Castro apparently weren't worth a mention. Amusingly, Politico brazenly double-dipped on certain candidates, putting them in both the win and loss columns.
Winners
Democratic Polls Betting Odds
- O'Rourke
- Biden*
- Harris
- Sanders
- Warren
- Yang*
Democratic Polls Usa
Losers
- Biden*
- Klobuchar
- Yang*
Democratic Polls Odds Today
Other reasonably well-trafficked political outlets also weighed in on the issue.
Democratic Polls Odds 2019
Heavy, a far-left 'edgy' site primarily aimed at American youth, published a poll with results strongly favoring Yang at 30.96 percent. Sanders took second with 20.37 percent, and Biden was third with 12.76 percent.
Of DC's two in-house rags, the conservative-leaning Washington Examiner ran a reader poll, with Yang crushing the field with 48.46 percent of respondents favoring his politics. Sanders was next at 14.21 percent, with Biden taking third at 10.2 percent. Warren was fourth at 7.8 percent.
Meanwhile, the left-wing Washington Post boldly declared that 'nobody' won the third debate. If you want to read their reasoning, the article is conveniently accessible behind a paywall.
So that's the roundup, folks.
If you were hoping that any particular candidate would separate himself or herself from the pack, you're probably disappointed. (Albeit Beto did kind of manage the feat, just in the wrong direction.)
The biggest story here, of course, is that Yang has managed to solidify his status as a legitimate top-tier contender, dunking on his competition as the most Googled candidate throughout the debate.